منابع مشابه
Winfried Lechner Reduced and Phrasal Comparatives
In this paper, I defend two hypotheses as to the derivation of phonologically reduced comparative constructions. On the one hand, I present evidence which supports an ellipsis analysis of phrasal comparatives over base-generation approaches. On the other hand, it is argued that the restrictions on deletion in comparatives are exhaustively determined by the principles governing Gapping, Right No...
متن کاملExperimental Evidence for the Syntax of Phrasal Comparatives in Polish
Pancheva (2009) argues that phrasal comparatives in Polish exhibit a subject-island effect. She proposes an account of the island effect as a combination of several factors: than has a small clause complement in phrasal comparatives; wh-movement turns the than-clause into a degree predicate; wh-movement of the vP subject is prohibited by an anti-locality constraint; sub-extraction of the vP sub...
متن کاملPhrasal comparatives in Japanese: A mea- sure function-based analysis
There has recently been much discussion about the proper analysis of Japanese comparatives (cf., e.g., Beck et al. 2004; Oda 2008; Hayashishita 2009; Kawahara 2009; Kennedy 2009). Most of the discussion in the previous literature centers around the question of whether the semantics of Japanese comparatives should be modelled on the analysis of English comparatives. Beck et al. (2004) have argue...
متن کاملPhrasal and clausal comparatives in Greek and the abstractness of syntax
Greek phrasal and reduced clausal comparatives differ in that the former, but not the latter, show island sensitivities. In neither case, however, is the material that constitutes the island pronounced. This paper argues that such facts can only be captured by positing abstract unpronounced syntactic structures over which the island constraints are stated; the comparison between the two kinds o...
متن کاملParsing and Interpreting Comparatives
1. INTRODUCTION We describe a fairly comprehensive handling of the syntax and semantics of comparative constructions. The analysis is largely based on the theory developed by Pinkham, but we advance arguments to support a different handling of phrasal comparatives-in particular, we use direct interpretation instead of C-ellipsis. We .explain the reasons for dividing comparative sentences into d...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
سال: 2011
ISSN: 0167-806X,1573-0859
DOI: 10.1007/s11049-011-9137-1